The 48 Game Schedule Format
The format for the season is very interesting, given that they will eliminate inter-conference games. Each team will play two of their division 'rivals' 5 times, the other two 4 times, and the remaining 30 games will be divided equally between the 10 other conference opponents. This is a messy schedule that will have huge playoff implications (I'll be the first to tell you the predictions I made in the offseason will be way off). For example, the Maple Leafs would much rather play their extra divisional games against Montreal or Ottawa, not Boston or Buffalo. How does the league determine how to split up these games? Ultimately, this format will benefit teams that perform well against division rivals, and hinder those who beat up on inter-conference opponents. Here is a breakdown of each team with the extreme ends of the spectrum emphasized (Green - benefit, Red - hindrance):
Standings
(2011/2012)
|
Vs.
Division
|
Vs.
East
|
Vs.
West
|
New York Rangers*
|
13-6-5
|
41-18-5
|
10-6-2
|
Boston Bruins*
|
19-4-1
|
38-23-3
|
11-6-1
|
Florida Panthers*
|
12-8-4
|
33-19-12
|
5-7-6
|
Pittsburgh Penguins
|
13-10-1
|
38-23-3
|
13-2-3
|
Philadelphia Flyers
|
11-11-2
|
36-21-7
|
11-5-2
|
New Jersey Devils
|
13-11-0
|
38-22-4
|
10-6-2
|
Washington Capitals
|
12-8-4
|
34-22-8
|
8-10-0
|
Ottawa Senators
|
9-12-3
|
34-22-8
|
7-9-2
|
Buffalo Sabres
|
13-6-5
|
28-26-10
|
11-6-1
|
Tampa Bay Lightning
|
13-7-4
|
29-29-6
|
9-7-2
|
Winnipeg Jets
|
14-6-4
|
29-26-9
|
8-9-1
|
Carolina Hurricanes
|
9-10-5
|
25-27-12
|
8-6-4
|
Toronto Maple Leafs
|
9-14-1
|
26-31-7
|
9-6-3
|
New York Islanders
|
8-13-3
|
27-30-7
|
7-7-4
|
Montreal Canadiens
|
10-8-6
|
24-28-12
|
7-7-4
|
Standings
(2011/2012)
|
Vs.
Division
|
Vs.
East
|
Vs.
West
|
Vancouver Canucks*
|
18-5-1
|
11-6-1
|
40-16-8
|
St. Louis Blues*
|
10-9-5
|
14-2-2
|
35-20-9
|
Phoenix Coyotes*
|
13-6-5
|
8-7-3
|
34-20-10
|
Nashville Predators
|
16-5-3
|
8-7-3
|
40-19-5
|
Detroit Red Wings
|
13-10-1
|
10-7-1
|
38-21-5
|
Chicago Blackhawks
|
16-6-2
|
12-3-3
|
33-23-8
|
San Jose Sharks
|
12-11-1
|
12-5-1
|
31-24-9
|
Los Angeles Kings
|
13-4-7
|
7-7-4
|
33-20-11
|
Calgary Flames
|
15-6-3
|
6-7-5
|
31-22-11
|
Dallas Stars
|
12-11-1
|
8-7-3
|
34-28-2
|
Colorado Avalanche
|
8-14-2
|
13-4-1
|
28-31-5
|
Minnesota Wild
|
11-12-1
|
5-9-4
|
30-27-7
|
Anaheim Ducks
|
10-7-3
|
8-6-4
|
26-30-8
|
Edmonton Oilers
|
8-11-5
|
8-7-3
|
24-33-7
|
Columbus Blue
Jackets
|
5-17-2
|
6-9-3
|
23-37-4
|
Notes:
- The West really beat up the East last year, with only 3 Western Conference teams going below .500 against East opponents
- Colorado seems to lose the most from this new setup, whereas Calgary are the largest beneficiaries
- If you take out games against the East, Dallas and San Jose would have swapped positions in the standings; with the Stars in the playoffs
- Though the Blues did very well last season, they struggled against their division and many of their points were from beating the East
- Even in the toughest division in hockey last year, the Rangers still dominated
- Even though they finished last in the conference, the Canadiens managed to perform well against divisional opponents
- The difference in teams that perform well against inter-conference teams but not so well against their own division/conference is mainly due to poor coaching
The abbreviated season will have the largest impact on those bubble teams fighting for a playoff spot, and the schedule makes these races even more interesting. In the East, the Jets fared well against their division but the immense distances they will travel in comparison to any other team could be the difference in earning a few important points. Because of the format, it's unlikely that tough divisions like the Atlantic and Central will once again have 4 teams make the cut again (I'm looking at you New Jersey and Nashville); so look for an extra Northwest and Southeast team to get to the dance this year. Age and chemistry are other factors to consider. Although my summer predictions saw Detroit missing the playoffs, I think the short season will allow for less wear and tear on their veterans and lead to success. If youthful teams like the Avalanche and Leafs get off to a hot start, they can secure a playoff appearance early despite consistent late season woes.On the contrary, a team with a lot of new acquisitions like Dallas could stumble out of the gate while attempting to develop chemistry. Being a bubble team without much room for error, this could leave the Stars on the outside looking in.
Just some food for thought as we prepare for the season beginning January 19th. Next week (in time for Fantasy Hockey) I will have a look at which players will break out in 2013, and which will bounce back from less than stellar 2012 campaigns.
No comments:
Post a Comment